After Round of Hot Potato, Moore v. Allen Cobb Law Firm Ends Up with Northern District Judges

In this post in January I wrote about a discrimination lawsuit by Sherrie Moore against the Allen, Cobb, Hood and Atkinson law firm based in Gulfport.

Since the initial filing, there have been a round of recusals by the Coast-based federal court judges:

The “winners” of the judicial sweepstakes are…….Chief Judge Michael Mills and Magistrate Judge Allan Alexander of the Northern District. But the case is still a Southern District case. It's not every day that you see a Coast case get kicked all the way up to Oxford. But it's understandable in a case between a lawyer and an established Coast firm.

 Judge Alexander set the Case Management Conference for April 19, 2011.

The defense lawyers are based out of Columbus and the plaintiff's lawyers are based out of Jackson. So the re-assignment should have little impact on the litigation. 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.mslitigationreview.com/admin/trackback/242727
Comments (3) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Anderson - March 15, 2011 10:31 AM

"So the re-assignment should have little impact on the litigation."

Yes, but the identities of the judges should have some effect on the settlement value.

Tim - March 15, 2011 8:18 PM

Anderson, why do you say that? I think Judge Mills calls it like he sees it and is a very good judge. I feel same way about Magistrate Pepper. Not sure what you mean?

Anderson - March 16, 2011 8:14 AM

Magistrate Alexander, not Pepper.

The fact that Mills is objective is a factor in itself. Not all judges in the S.D. are objective on civil-rights cases.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.