Faulkner Was Right About the Past---George W. Bush Listed as President in 2010 at New Federal Courthouse in Jackson

Who was the President in 2010? Anyone who said George W. Bush is wrong, unless they are going by the inscription at the new federal courthouse in Jackson.

The photo below was taken on Wednesday.  

 

It's a federal building for God's sake. You would think that the feds could get the identity of the President in 2010 right.

Update: NMC explains the reason for the error--and I'm still calling it an error--here.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.mslitigationreview.com/admin/trackback/242390
Comments (8) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Anderson - March 11, 2011 6:12 AM

A deliberate slap in the face at Obama. Someone's head should roll.

Judge Mental - March 11, 2011 7:35 AM

Talk about revisionist history!

mattdev - March 11, 2011 9:11 AM

I'll give the feds the benefit of the doubt, here. Perhaps Bush is listed on the courthouse as he was POTUS when funding was secured for the construction of the courthouse. And, 2010 is listed as that was the date of completion on the courthouse, with no correlation between the two.

Plausible?

Jim Galloway - March 11, 2011 9:38 AM

That reminds me of the time, about 10 years ago, when I was giving a visitor from Massachusetts a tour of Beauvoir. She saw the bust of Jefferson Davis at the entrance to the museum, and when she read the inscription "President, 1861-1865", she exclaimed, "Why, Lincoln was the president!", and I replied, "Not of this country."

NMissC - March 11, 2011 12:06 PM

I have the answer to how this happened on my blog. It's the GSA's fault (surprise!).

Tim - March 11, 2011 9:13 PM

I don't understand why you're still calling it an error when, if I read the explanation right, it complies with GSA rules on cornerstones.

Philip Thomas - March 12, 2011 8:30 AM

The GSA rule explains why it's wrong. It doesn't make it right.

society's pliers - March 12, 2011 7:05 PM

Kind of funny how easily folks will see conspiracy/offense where none exists.
I am glad it is not confined to tea-partiers.
What did you expect from the federal govt?

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.