Mississippi Litigation Review & Commentary : Mississippi Personal Injury Lawyer & Attorney : Phillip W. Thomas Law Firm : MS Litigation Review & Commentary

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

More information is emerging about the $3 million jury verdict rendered in federal court in Jackson on Friday.

On August 26, 2006 the Plaintiff Megan Durr was a Target employee working in the Target store on I-55 and Countyline Road in Jackson. MBS Construction was an independent contractor doing remodeling in the store for Target. MBS was deconstructing a 14 foot wall and pulled the bolts out on one side causing the wall to fall on Megan Durr and another employee who were working for Target on the other side of the wall. MBS provided no notice of its actions, no warning to the plaintiff and did not mark off the work area to limit access to non-construction persons.

The plaintiff suffered lower and mid back pains and had a double fusion at L4-5 and L5-S1 in December 2009. Her total medicals were about $174,000.00. She claimed lost wages, future medical damages, and pain and suffering. She did not seek punitives.

The defendant claimed the plaintiff had pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The Plaintiff had an almost two year period in 2005 to 2006 where she was either pain free or did not see a doctor for back pain. The defendant also raised the issue that her first two neurosurgeons in 2004 and 2005 recommended against a surgery because the plaintiff claimed to show improvement with medication and physical therapy.

Target joined the suit to recover its workers compensation lien. At trial, Target was not represented by counsel and the plaintiff represented Target's claims. The judge allowed the defendant to allege Target also had a duty to protect its employee and provide a safe work environment even though the defendant did not put on evidence of Target's duty, breach or causation. The evidence presented showed that MBS had an indemnity agreement with Target and still would be liable for any apportionment against Target.

The jury found $2.5 million for pain and suffering and disability, $350,000.00 for hospitalization and medical and nursing care, $100,000.00 for lost wages- Totaling $2,950,000.00.

Ashley Ogden tried the case for plaintiff, assisted by Jim Smith and Wendy Yuan of Ogden and Associates, PLLC.

Greg Spyridon of Spyridon, Palermo, and Dornan, LLC represented the defendant, assisted by John Herke of the same firm and John Corlew of Jackson.

The $2.5 million for pain and suffering will probably be reduced to $1 million due to Mississippi's cap on non-economic damages. Of course, the constitutionality of the cap is currently before the Mississippi Supreme Court.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (2)
• Trackbacks

There are reports of Ashley Ogden obtaining another large verdict in a premises case, this one in federal court in Jackson. Here is the Complaint in Durr v. MBS Construction.

The Plaintiff was shopping at the Target Store in Jackson in 2004 when a wall fell on her, causing severe injuries. MBS was performing construction work in the store. Target intervened in the case. I am not sure who the verdict was against, since the verdict has not yet been posted on Pacer. I believe that the filing part of Pacer is down for the weekend, so it will probably be filed Monday. There is also no Pre-Trial Order on Pacer, so information about the parties and issues at trial is scarce.

The Plaintiff had a back injury that required surgery and had approximately $180,000 in medicals.

Former Chief Justice Jim Smith and Wendy Yaun [correction: Yuan] tried the case with Ogden. Defense counsel were Greg Spyridon and other attorneys from his New Orleans firm and John Corlew of Jackson. Corlew filed his entry of appearance three days before trial, which I am sure limited his ability to have a meaningful influence on the outcome.

Judge Tom Lee was the trial judge.

I hope to have more on this verdict next week.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks

There was a plaintiff’s verdict yesterday in federal court in Natchez in favor of Ill. Central RR against McComb lawyers  William Guy and Thomas Brock. The trial involved the claims in two cases. Here are the Amended Complaints in the Turner case and the Harried case. Ill. Central sued the lawyers and their clients, but the clients obtained a defense verdict at trial.

The Complaints alleged that the individual defendants were plaintiffs in the big Cosey Jefferson County asbestos case that was filed in 1995 in which there was a massive plaintiff verdict around ten years ago. It was one of the verdicts that led to tort reform in Mississippi.

The defendants sued Ill. Central in 2001 in Jefferson County asserting an FELA claim related to exposure to asbestos. The defendants failed to disclose to Ill. Central that they were plaintiffs in the Cosey case and settled their claims with Ill. Central for $90,000 and $120,000 respectively. The individual defendants testified that the lawyers (Guy and Brock) were aware of their prior asbestos claims in Cosey.

Ill. Central sued the lawyers and their clients for fraud. I believe that the verdict was for the $90,000 and $120,000 previously paid by Ill. Central, but a judgment is not on file yet, so I am not sure.

I also do not know what happened in the punitives phase. I hope to report more on this verdict later.

Danny Mulholland and Tanya Ellis with Forman Perry represented Ill. Central. John Corlew and Kathy Smith of Jackson represented the defendant lawyers. Wayne Dowdy of McComb represented the individuals. Judge David Bramlette presided over the trial.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

An A.P. article reported in the Clarion-Ledger stated that Sherwin-Williams plans to appeal the $7 million lead paint verdict in Jefferson County last week:

An attorney for Sherwin-Williams said the company will appeal the verdict. Attorney John Corlew said Sherwin-Williams hasn’t used lead in residential paint since 1972.

Before an appeal Sherwin-Williams will file post-trial motions asking Judge Lamar Pickard to issue a judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Sherwin-Williams will probably also ask the judge to reduce the amount of the verdict. Those types of motions are usually denied by trial judges, but they must be filed an ruled on before a filing a notice of appeal. That means that an appeal will not be filed for weeks. A ruling on an appeal is probably two years away. The case could also settle before an appeal is filed or during the appeals process.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks

There are reports of a $7 million plus jury verdict this week in a Jefferson County lead paint trial. The case was Pollard vs. Sherwin-Williams Company. It's my understanding that Plaintiff's counsel included Tim Porter and Dennis Sweet of Jackson and Michael Casano of Gulfport. Defense counsel were John Corlew and Kathy Smith of Jackson.

The trial was of a case where Circuit Court Judge Lamar Pickard granted summary judgment for the Defendant and the Court of Appeals affirmed. On appeal, the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case for a trial on the merits. Here is the Supreme Court's opinion. Barring a settlement, look for this verdict to be appealed.