Uncategorized

Harrison County Circuit Judge Jerry Terry to retire

The Sun Herald is reporting that Circuit Court Judge Jerry Terry has announced his retirement effective June 30. Judge Terry is seventy-five years old and has served on the bench for twenty-two years. He served in the second circuit, which included Harrison, Hancock and Stone Counties.

Governor Barbour will appoint a replacement to fill the remainder of Judge Terry’s term, which expires at the end of 2010. Harrison County Assistant District Attorney John Gargiulo might be on the list of canidates to replace Judge Terry.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn

Harrison County Circuit Judge Jerry Terry to retire

The Sun Herald is reporting that Circuit Court Judge Jerry Terry has announced his retirement effective June 30. Judge Terry is seventy-five years old and has served on the bench for twenty-two years. He served in the second circuit, which included Harrison, Hancock and Stone Counties.

Governor Barbour will appoint a replacement to fill the remainder of Judge Terry’s term, which expires at the end of 2010. Harrison County Assistant District Attorney John Gargiulo might be on the list of canidates to replace Judge Terry.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn

2007 BusinessWeek article on viatical settlements

I discussed the controversy surrounding viatical settlements in this earlier post. For anyone interested in the viatical settlement business, here was the headline and excerpts from a 2007 Business Week article :

Profiting From Mortality
Death bonds may be the most macabre investment scheme ever devised by Wall Street.

Life settlements” are arrangements that offer people the chance to sell their policies to investors, who keep paying the premiums until the sellers die and then collect the payout. For the investors it’s a ghoulish actuarial gamble: The quicker the death, the more profit is reaped. Most of the transactions are done by small local firms called life settlement providers, which in the past have typically sold the policies to hedge funds. Now, Wall Street sees huge profits in buying policies, throwing them into a pool, dividing the pool into bonds, and selling the bonds to pension funds, college endowments, and other professional investors. If the market develops as Wall Street expects, ordinary mutual funds will soon be able to get in on the action, too.

BUT THE INVESTMENT BANKS are wading into murky waters. The life settlements industry increasingly finds itself in the grip of dubious characters devising audacious and in some cases illegal schemes to make money. Many are targeting elderly people with deceptive sales pitches—so many that the National Association of Securities Dealers has issued a warning about abusive practices. Others are promising investors unrealistic returns or misleading them about the risks. Some are doing both.

The complete article is worth the read.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn

Colson update: Has A&O Life been watching too much Wall Street?

In this memorable quote from the movie Wall Street the character played by Michael Douglas tells Bud to call a number and tell the man that Blue Horseshoe Loves Anacott Steel. A&O Life’s filing in federal court listing its member partners reminded me of this quote. The only new name identified in the affidavit was Blue Dymond Capital Group, LLC, a citizen of the West Indies. The person signing the affidavit was A&O front man Russell Mackert.

Mr. Mackert claims to have personal knowledge of the facts in the affidavit, but does not explain who he is, how he obtained that knowledge or his relationship with A&O. The affidavit does not mention Adley Wahab, who is presumably the man behind the curtain. Mackert and A&O seem shady–real shady. Their presence in this litigation is bad for Steve Colson, because he was doing business with these shady characters.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn

Colson Update: Judge Ozerden demands info. on identity of A&O Life

In my prior post I mentioned that it looked like Lawyer’s Title v. Colson intervenor A&O Life does not want much known about its identity. Looks like Judge Ozerden thought the same thing, except he did something about it with this Text Order issued today:

TEXT ONLY ORDER directing Lewis Holdings, LLC; ReMax Alliance; A&O Bonded Life Assets Management, LLC; A&O Bonded Life Assets, LLC; A&O Bonded Life Settlements Management, LLC; A&O Bonded Life Settlements, LLC; A&O Capital Management, LLC; A&O Life Fund Management, LLC; A&O Life Fund, LLC; A&O Life Funds Management; LLC, A&O Life Funds, LLC; A&O Resource Management, Ltd.; Houston Tanglewood Partners, LLC; Life Fund 5.1 Management, LLC; Life Fund 5.1, LLC; Life Fund 5.2 Management, LLC; and Life Fund 5.2, LLC, to file into the record in this case an Affidavit or Declaration identifying the citizenship of each of their respective members or partners, or if not a partnership or limited liability company, identifying their state of incorporation and principal place of business, on or before Friday, May 15, 2009. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT REGARDING THIS DIRECTIVE. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 5/8/2009. (EMN) (Entered: 05/08/2009)

It’s pretty funny that A&O’s efforts to conceal its identity actually brought more attention to it.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn

Colson Update: A&O Life Hedge Fund Claims $3 million

The Colson litigation now involves a $3 million claim involving viatical settlements by A&O Bonded Assets and related entites. Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

In viatical settlements an owner of a life insurance policy sells his future death benfit to an “investor” for a lump sum payment. The “investor” then pays the premiums until the insured dies, and collects the death benefit at death. Unlike the life insurance company, which would just as soon the insured live forever, the “investor” is cheering for death, since it allows him to earn the return on his investment. Needless to say, viatical settments are controversial and are rife for abuse by the “investors”, since many life insurance owners are not financially sophisticated enough to know whether the payout is fair. In addition, viatical settlements arguably defeat the purpose of life insurance, but that is a topic for another day.

Here is A&O’s Motion to Intervene in the Lawyer’s Title case, supporting memorandum and supporting affidavit of Russell Mackert. The affidavit does not describe Mackert’s relationship to A&O, but the results of a Google search indicate that Mackert is a Houston, TX area lawyer. It appears that Mackert is a front man for the real investors: the hedge fund A&O Life Funds. A&O Life either does not want anyone to know much about it, or it has the worst web site designer in the world.

The memo provides a more detailed explanation of the claim than the motion. In 2008 A&O Bonded Life Assets Management LLC and related entities entered into a Escrow Management Services Agreement with Prestige Title. A&O deposited $4.6 million with Prestige Title that Prestige was to use to pay the premiums on the policies. In return for Prestige’s services, A&O paid Prestige $150,000 annually. A&O claims that its $4.6 million was comingled with other Colson entity firms and then sequested as a part of the Lawyers Title case and Wachovia intepleader action. It looks like Prestige paid the premiums for a while and that A&O’s real loss is approximately $3 million.

A&O also claims that Prestige has not been paying the premiums on the policies and that some of the policies will lapse soon unless the premiums are paid. A&O places the value on the policies where a lapse is imminent at $29 million. The total value of the policies at issue is $179 million. Here is a partial list of the policies, which have huge face amounts. Obviously, A&O is not going to let these policies lapse and will cover the premiums if Prestige does not pay. A&O is trying to cut its losses by recovering money in the ongoing litigation. It’s hard to imagine a less sympathetic party in this litigation. A&O’s attorney is former Mississippi Bar President Don Dornan, so at least it has a respected attorney.

In another Colson development I have learned that Colson is suing Tedd Martin, who is his partner in Prestige, in state court. State court pleadings are public record, but are not accessible on-line. I do not know what Colson alleges in the action.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn

Colson Update: A&O Life Hedge Fund Claims $3 million

The Colson litigation now involves a $3 million claim involving viatical settlements by A&O Bonded Assets and related entites. Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

In viatical settlements an owner of a life insurance policy sells his future death benfit to an “investor” for a lump sum payment. The “investor” then pays the premiums until the insured dies, and collects the death benefit at death. Unlike the life insurance company, which would just as soon the insured live forever, the “investor” is cheering for death, since it allows him to earn the return on his investment. Needless to say, viatical settments are controversial and are rife for abuse by the “investors”, since many life insurance owners are not financially sophisticated enough to know whether the payout is fair. In addition, viatical settlements arguably defeat the purpose of life insurance, but that is a topic for another day.

Here is A&O’s Motion to Intervene in the Lawyer’s Title case, supporting memorandum and supporting affidavit of Russell Mackert. The affidavit does not describe Mackert’s relationship to A&O, but the results of a Google search indicate that Mackert is a Houston, TX area lawyer. It appears that Mackert is a front man for the real investors: the hedge fund A&O Life Funds. A&O Life either does not want anyone to know much about it, or it has the worst web site designer in the world.

The memo provides a more detailed explanation of the claim than the motion. In 2008 A&O Bonded Life Assets Management LLC and related entities entered into a Escrow Management Services Agreement with Prestige Title. A&O deposited $4.6 million with Prestige Title that Prestige was to use to pay the premiums on the policies. In return for Prestige’s services, A&O paid Prestige $150,000 annually. A&O claims that its $4.6 million was comingled with other Colson entity firms and then sequested as a part of the Lawyers Title case and Wachovia intepleader action. It looks like Prestige paid the premiums for a while and that A&O’s real loss is approximately $3 million.

A&O also claims that Prestige has not been paying the premiums on the policies and that some of the policies will lapse soon unless the premiums are paid. A&O places the value on the policies where a lapse is imminent at $29 million. The total value of the policies at issue is $179 million. Here is a partial list of the policies, which have huge face amounts. Obviously, A&O is not going to let these policies lapse and will cover the premiums if Prestige does not pay. A&O is trying to cut its losses by recovering money in the ongoing litigation. It’s hard to imagine a less sympathetic party in this litigation. A&O’s attorney is former Mississippi Bar President Don Dornan, so at least it has a respected attorney.

In another Colson development I have learned that Colson is suing Tedd Martin, who is his partner in Prestige, in state court. State court pleadings are public record, but are not accessible on-line. I do not know what Colson alleges in the action.

Twitter
Facebook
Email
LinkedIn